Online Service
 Work Time
Mon to Fri :9:00-18:00
Contact us

Address: Level 26,Fortune Financial Center,No.5 Dongsanhuanzhong Rd,Chaoyang District,Beijing

Contact: Wang He

Mobile: 18601920470

Tel: 010-57750598

Fax: 010-57750350

E-mail: wanghe@ugtech.com.cn

News Detail

Use the internet? This Linux flaw could open you up to attack

A flaw in the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) used by Linux since late 2012 poses a serious threat to internet users, whether or not they use Linux directly.


Threats — Threats are actions or events (intentional or unintentional) which, if realized, will result in waste, fraud, abuse, or disruption of operations.
That’s the key finding of a research study that’s scheduled to be presented Wednesday at the USENIX Security Symposium in Austin, Texas.
The TCP weakness, identified by researchers from the University of California at Riverside (UCR), enables attackers to hijack users’ internet communications remotely. It could be used to launch targeted attacks that track users’ online activity, forcibly terminate a communication, hijack a conversation between hosts or degrade the privacy guarantee of anonymity networks such as Tor, the researchers said.


Because Linux runs behind the scenes on countless internet servers, Android phones and a range of other devices, a broad swath of users may be affected.
Linux and other operating systems use TCP to package and send data being transferred from one place to another. When two people communicate by email, for example, TCP assembles each message into a series of data packets that are transmitted, received and then reassembled into the original message. Those packets are identified by unique sequence numbers that could be handy for attackers, but typically there are too many possibilities to make those numbers guessable.


That’s under ordinary circumstances. The subtle flaw the researchers found uses something called “side channels” in the Linux software to make it possible for attackers to infer the TCP sequence numbers associated with a particular connection by using no more information than the IP addresses of the communicating parties.


So, given any two arbitrary machines on the internet, a remote attacker can track users’ online activity, terminate connections with others and inject false material into their communications. Even encrypted HTTPS connections — which are immune to data injection — could be forcibly terminated. Attackers could also undermine anonymity networks like Tor by forcing connections to route through certain relays.


The attack is fast and reliable, often taking less than a minute and succeeding about 90 percent of the time, the researchers said. The video below explains it in more detail.
“The unique aspect of the attack we demonstrated is the very low requirement to be able to carry it out,” said Zhiyun Qian, an assistant professor of computer science at UCR.


“Essentially, it can be done easily by anyone in the world where an attack machine is in a network that allows IP spoofing. The only piece of information that is needed is the pair of IP addresses for victim client and server, which is fairly easy to obtain.”


Qian’s team has alerted the Linux community to the vulnerability, and the next version of Linux is already patched. In the meantime, Qian recommends a temporary patch for both client and server hosts. It’s outlined in an announcement on the UCR site. The researchers’ full paper is also available online.


“A side-channel attack capable of predicting TCP sequence numbers is a pretty serious problem,” said Craig Young, security researcher for Tripwire, via email.

 One potential result is to allow attackers to launch the kind of TCP hijacking attacks that were so prominent in the 1990s hacking scene, Young said.


Kevin Mitnick rose to fame during that era for performing what’s known as session hijacking by exploiting TCP’s vulnerabilities at the time.
“Back then the problem was that many computers would generate initial sequence values from the clock, thereby greatly reducing the number of guesses needed to take control of a remote session,” Young said.


Data, however, is an asset that may have a monetary value (the cost to acquire), a non-monetary value (loss of public confidence regarding data accuracy), or both.